🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's parliament members have voted to withdraw from an global treaty designed to protect women from abuse, covering family violence, following prolonged and heated discussions in the parliament.

Thousands of protesters assembled in the capital this past week to voice disagreement with the vote. The ultimate authority now rests with Head of State the nation's president, who must decide whether to approve or veto the proposed law.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only became active in the Baltic state last year, requiring governments to establish legal frameworks and support services to end all types of abuse.

Latvia has become the initial EU country to initiate the process of withdrawing from the convention. Turkey pulled out in 2021, a decision that human rights organizations characterized as a significant regression for women's rights.

Ideological Debate and Opposition

The international agreement was approved by the European Union in last year, yet traditionalist groups have argued that its emphasis on gender equality undermines traditional families and promotes what they term "gender ideology".

Following a lengthy debate in the Latvian parliament, MPs voted 56 to 32 to exit from the treaty, a action sponsored by opposition parties but supported by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The outcome represents a defeat for moderate conservative government leader Evika Silina, who stood with protesters outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that violence will not prevail," she stated to the assembly.

Political Disagreements and Responses

One of the main political groups supporting the exit is a nationalist party, whose head has called on citizens to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "gender ideology with multiple sexes".

The nation's ombudswoman Karina Palkova appealed for the treaty not to be made political, while the organization Equality Now asserted it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The Thursday's decision has sparked broad outcry both within the country and abroad.

22,000 people have endorsed a national appeal calling for the treaty to be maintained. The women's rights organization the rights center has announced a protest for next Thursday, accusing lawmakers of ignoring the will of the nation's citizens.

International Worries and Potential Future Actions

The leader of the European organization's legislative body commented that the Baltic state had made a hasty choice fueled by misinformation. He described it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying step backward for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He noted that since Turkey left the treaty in 2021, cases of gender-based killings and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not achieve a supermajority majority, the president could potentially send back the legislation for further consideration if he holds concerns.

President the national leader stated on social media that he would evaluate the vote according to constitutional principles, "taking into account state and legal factors, instead of ideological or political viewpoints".

Recently, another member of the governing alliance, the reformist party, suggested it would not exclude appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This vote represents a worrisome situation for women's rights not only in Latvia but across the continent," stated a rights activist.

• Domestic abuse rates have been increasing in several European countries
• The European treaty mandates particular safeguards for survivors of gender-based violence
• The nation's vote could affect similar discussions in other member states